Europe has so far “neglected” the increasing competitiveness of Chinese chip design companies, presenting “challenges across the dimensions of national security, supply chain resilience and technological competitiveness for Europe,” European research institutions said in a recent report. Written by the Digital Power China research consortium and the Leiden Asia Centre, the report said the EU should better invest in its own chip design capabilities, strengthen the “indispensability” of its chip firms through “policy interventions,” “map the risk profile of increasing reliance on Chinese chip design” and more.
Exports to China
Top Chinese academics believe the country should “amass a portfolio of patents that govern the next generation of chipmaking” to allow the country to counter U.S. semiconductor export controls, according to a Feb. 20 Bloomberg report. The report cites a bulletin recently published by the Chinese Academy of Sciences, the country’s “most influential scientific body,” which could represent China’s plan to evade U.S. export restrictions and demonstrate how it “could win a crucial technological conflict with Washington,” the report said.
As U.S. government regulators continue to face pressure from Congress to more quickly place export restrictions on emerging technologies, the Commerce Department and industry officials are grappling with the potential ethical consequences of controls on a technology that could have groundbreaking medical benefits.
The Bureau of Industry and Security suspended the export privileges of three people this week, including one person who tried to ship controlled items to an entity on the Entity List.
The U.S., the EU and others can take steps to improve how they administer export controls, deliver guidance to industry and more efficiently target dangerous end users, experts said this week. One expert specifically called on the U.S. to revise the Entity List, which should better isolate the worst export control offenders.
The Commerce Department is trying to find a way to screen outbound investments in a way that protects domestic commercial interests but limits collateral damage to businesses with interests outside the U.S., said Marisa Lago, the agency’s undersecretary for international trade. Lago’s comments came one day after Samm Sacks, an expert on U.S.-China technology policy issues, said the Biden administration hasn’t yet released an executive order to create an outbound investment screening regime because of discussions surrounding implementation challenges.
Export Compliance Daily is providing readers with the top stories from last week in case you missed them. You can find any article by searching for the title or by clicking on the hyperlinked reference number.
China "firmly opposes" the U.S. move to add six Chinese entities to the Entity List over their ties to China's "High Altitude Balloons" intelligence and reconnaissance activities, China's Ministry of Commerce said, according to an unofficial translation. Responding to a reporter's question on the inclusion of the entities, the ministry said it hopes the U.S. "will stop its unreasonable suppression of Chinese companies and will take necessary measures to resolutely safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese companies."
The U.S. is making “good progress” on aligning export controls over sensitive technologies with allies, Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman said this week, adding that almost all the administration's recent discussions with trading partners have involved China technology issues. She also said the agency is working to counter a growing oil partnership between China and Iran, but said preventing China’s purchases has proven challenging.
The Biden administration’s implementation of its new China chip export controls (see 2210070049) has been “mixed,” and it remains unclear how far allies will go to impose similar restrictions, said Clete Willems, who was a National Security Council official during the Trump administration. Willems, in written testimony this week to the House Financial Services Committee, said he doesn’t understand why the administration didn’t initially coordinate the October export control rule with allies, a shortcoming that could be hurting U.S. companies now.