The EU is ramping up efforts to monitor Russia-related export control evasion and hopes to soon make more progress on sanctions enforcement within the U.S.-EU Trade and Technology Council, said Sabine Weyand, the European Commission’s director general for trade, speaking during a July 13 event hosted by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. She expects EU enforcement to soon pick up because many of the bloc’s wind-down periods for the restrictions are ending.
Exports to China
Although Chinese companies with little international exposure may decide to violate export restrictions against Russia, most of the larger companies likely won’t take the risk, experts said. So far, most Chinese companies are complying with the sanctions and only continuing to buy Russian oil and gas, the experts said, despite strong opposition to Western sanctions by the Chinese government.
The U.S. should closely monitor Chinese attempts to steal sensitive information and technology from universities, but not in a way that will sacrifice open academic exchanges, said Christine Fox, a former Defense Department official, speaking during a July 7 Brookings Institution event. She said the threat of trade theft from China is real, but the number of foreign Chinese students and researchers who try to steal technology is just a small percentage of the total.
Although China hasn’t yet implemented its anti-foreign-sanctions law in Hong Kong, it may only be a matter of time, said Jessica Bartlett, the global head of financial crime legal at Barclays, speaking during a July 6 event hosted by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. She said multinational companies are continuing to face a “challenging” sanctions compliance environment in Hong Kong, which could grow more difficult depending on how the government decides whether and if to penalize firms for complying with foreign sanctions.
The State Department declined to say whether the U.S. will impose financial sanctions against the Chinese companies accused by the Commerce Department last week of helping Russia evade export controls. Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Texas, last week called on the agency to impose the sanctions (see 2206300007) and go beyond Commerce’s move of adding them to the Entity List (see 2206280056).
The U.S. didn’t do enough to penalize the Chinese companies accused by the Commerce Department this week of helping Russia evade export controls (see 2206280056), the top Republican on the House Foreign Affairs Committee said. Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Texas, said the U.S should also have placed financial sanctions on the companies, adding that State Department Deputy Secretary Wendy Sherman told the committee in April that China would face “consequences” if its companies provided support to Russia.
Although the U.S. and allies are discussing creating a new multilateral export control framework, it’s too soon to tell whether those talks will result in a formal regime, said Alan Estevez, undersecretary of the Bureau of Industry and Security. He said the group of countries has “momentum” toward a new framework, but they haven’t yet agreed to establish a formal organization to replace some of the existing multilateral regimes, such as the Wassenaar Arrangement.
Export controls may not stop all illegal shipments, but that doesn’t mean the U.S. and others should not work to improve cooperation and coordination, experts agreed during a June 27 Brookings Institution panel.
The U.S. this week announced a host of new sanctions targeting Russia’s defense industrial base, including export restrictions against entities helping Moscow evade U.S. export controls and new financial sanctions targeting state-owned companies. The sanctions target more than 100 entities and 50 people supporting Russia’s defense industry and add 36 entities to the Commerce Department’s Entity List, including six for supporting Russia’s military.
A bipartisan group of senators last week introduced a bill that could place new controls on certain exports of U.S. personal data to foreign companies and governments. The Protecting Americans’ Data From Foreign Surveillance Act would require the Commerce Department, along with other agencies, to identify “categories of personal data” that could harm U.S. national security if they were exported, and to place export restrictions on those items.