A “groundbreaking” settlement agreement between a German software company and three U.S. agencies (see 2104290069 and 2105070042) may signal greater enforcement of sanctions and export violations and present more compliance challenges for industry, law firms said. The more than $8 million settlement between SAP SE and the Justice, Treasury and Commerce departments -- the first non-prosecution agreement under the Justice Department's revised voluntary disclosure policies (see 2008180043) -- also includes several important lessons for businesses and may lay out how monitorships can be avoided, the firms said.
Export Compliance Daily is providing readers with the top stories for May 10-14 in case you missed them. You can find any article by searching on the title or by clicking on the hyperlinked reference number.
The Bureau of Industry and Security issued more than $100,000 in combined penalties against two companies for illegally exporting thousands of dollars worth of goods to Iran, Russia and Ukraine. BIS imposed a $60,000 fine and temporarily denied the export privileges for Kleiss & Co., a Netherlands-based company that BIS said illegally shipped “extruded butyl sealants” from the U.S. to Iran. The agency also fined Texas-based TeleDynamics $55,000 for illegally exporting rifle scopes from the U.S. to Russia and Ukraine.
The U.S. issued guidance last week to address industry uncertainty and a rising number of questions about export licensing jurisdiction for goods sent under its Foreign Military Sales Program. The guidance -- which includes frequently asked questions developed by Homeland Security, CBP and the Commerce, State and Defense departments -- was issued because the agencies “continue to receive questions” about exports that were moved from the U.S. Munitions List to the Commerce Control List but are exported under FMS authority. They said exporters are “having difficulty” understanding how Commerce’s Export Administration Regulations, the State Department’s International Traffic in Arms Regulations and the FMS Program “relate to each other” for goods that have recently transitioned from the ITAR to the EAR.
Export Compliance Daily is providing readers with the top stories for May 3-7 in case you missed them. You can find any article by searching on the title or by clicking on the hyperlinked reference number.
A U.S. district court judge dismissed a case involving the seizure of a multimillion-dollar jet after Texas officials failed to prove the jet violated export regulations or was involved in a money-laundering scheme. Texas police seized the British Aerospace BAE 125 Series jet last year on tax evasion and money-laundering charges and suggested the owners violated the Export Administration Regulations, but a judge said police had no evidence or probable cause.
More than 50 Democrats urged the Biden administration to keep State Department export controls over 3D printed guns, saying their transfer to the Commerce Department is “profoundly dangerous” and will allow “anyone to build untraceable firearms on demand.” The lawmakers, led by Sen. Ed Markey of Massachusetts and Rep. Grace Meng of New York, urged the administration to “place strict regulatory controls” over the weapons and their technical data.
The Bureau of Industry and Security again extended the comment period on an information collection related to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s bidding process, a notice said. The information collection pertains to the process BIS must undergo to determine whether U.S. firms are eligible to participate in NATO’s bidding process and supply certain goods. BIS previously requested comments in January and extended the comment period in March (see 2103170024). The agency said it will extend the comment period by an additional 30 days. Comments are now due by June 9.
Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo said she plans to heavily enforce Entity List restrictions and more aggressively tackle the agency's emerging and foundational technology export control mandate. And although the agency’s review of China policies is ongoing (see 2101250049), she again stressed that Commerce doesn’t plan to remove export restrictions from Huawei and is looking for more companies to add to the Entity List.
Export Compliance Daily is providing readers with the top stories for April 26-30 in case you missed them. You can find any article by searching on the title or by clicking on the hyperlinked reference number.