Several telecom groups wrote the Senate Commerce Committee leadership Wed. to express support for S-241, legislation that would permanently exempt the Universal Service Fund (USF) from Anti-Deficiency Act (ADA) requirements. The Committee has held a hearing on the bill (CD April 12 p1), introduced by Sen. Snowe (R-Me.) and co-sponsored by Senate Commerce Committee Chmn. Stevens (R-Alaska), Committee ranking Democrat Inouye (Hawaii), and Sen. Rockefeller (D-W. Va.). No markup’s scheduled for the bill, and the groups urged quick action in the letter. “Given the potential disruption to all universal service programs, it is vital for the Commerce Committee to address this issue as soon as possible, so that the uncertainty that currently hangs over these programs can be permanently eliminated,” the letter said. Since the Office of Management & Budget (OMB) required the FCC to apply ADA rules to USF last year, the program has needed funds in hand to make disbursement commitment. Congress last year passed a temporary one-year exemption from ADA, since it would have resulted in missed payments from USF and the E-rate program. The letter said: “Without such an exemption, millions of people will undoubtedly experience service disruptions and significant increases in the universal service contribution factor.” Signers of the letter include Alcatel, Apple, Independent Telephone & Telecom Alliance, NARUC, NASUCA, National Education Assn., NTCA, OPASTCO, TIA, U.S. Conference of Mayors and Western Wireless.
More than 100 rural telecom executives hit Capitol Hill Tues. to start 2 days of lobbying for universal service and broadband issues as part of an annual event sponsored by OPASTCO. In a morning briefing, OPASTCO staff told rural ILECs Antideficiency Act (ADA) legislation should top their agendas as they visited representatives and senators from their home states.
WILLIAMSBURG, Va -- Comr. Abernathy called for a change in the Sunshine rules to let FCC commissioners meet in private as needed to get consensus on complex issues out of the public eye. Abernathy told the FCBA annual retreat held here Fri. and Sat. that 1970s-vintage rules work against development of policy on critical but complicated issues.
Rep. Terry (R-Neb.) is working on universal service fund reform legislation designed to appeal to rural advocates and House Commerce Committee Chmn. Barton (R- Tex.), a House source told us. USF reform is a major goal of rural telecom interests this session and the issue is high on Senate Commerce Committee Chmn. Stevens’ (R- Alaska) agenda, sources said. But Barton has raised questions about the program and said Fri. an “academic argument” could be made for its elimination, though he admitted the political impossibility of ending the program. The House source said Terry’s bill would be a full restructuring of the USF program, but specific details weren’t available. But the source said Terry’s staff is considering a “hybrid model” for USF contribution that could include elements of a revenue-based system and a numbers-based system. A system of contribution based on telephone numbers probably would create more contributors to USF, since the existing system relies specifically on long-distance revenue. AT&T had backed a numbers-based approach, but it’s unclear whether the proposed merger with SBC has changed the company’s position. Also, FCC Chmn. Martin has spoken in favor of a number-based approach. The House source said the bill would aim to expand the contribution base of USF and try to expand USF’s jurisdiction to allow collection on intrastate calls. Now, only interstate calls can be used in assessing funds. It’s unclear how the bill would handle USF distributions, the source said. The source said the bill wouldn’t address E-rate funding, which Barton wants eliminated. And it’s unclear whether the bill will include a provision to modify the USF’s non-rural high- cost portion. Terry introduced a bill last year that would change how this fund is distributed to large ILECs. Under the existing system, Miss., Ala. and W. Va. ILECs get the most funding, since they serve the most rural consumers. But western states say the fund, which totals about $260 million yearly, should be distributed more evenly to their states since geography and distance raise the cost of deploying telecom service to these rural areas. Qwest would be a primary beneficiary of this change. Sen. Smith (R-Ore.) has introduced legislation (S-284) this session that would make that change.
No significant universal service fund reform in Congress is likely to be enacted until at least 2007, two members of Congress told a Center for the New West forum Fri. Sen. Craig (R-Ida.) and Rep. Cannon (R-Utah) said other legislative priorities, coupled with the issue’s complexity, make 2007 a likelier timeline for enactment. These members’ evaluation is noteworthy, since neither sits on his chamber’s Commerce Committee. They said their judgments are based on members’ knowledge and attitudes, not on the expert Committees.
Wireless carriers disagreed on whether the CMRS market was competitive enough. As the FCC gathers information for its annual report on CMRS competition, smaller wireless carriers expressed concern about the problems they had experienced in obtaining commercially reasonable roaming agreement with large nationwide carriers. SouthernLinc Wireless complained that Nextel and Nextel Partners -- the only domestic carriers SouthernLinc could roam with -- had repeatedly “engaged in unreasonable roaming practices to the detriment of wireless consumers,” especially those who relied on iDEN networks. It said the FCC “should be aware that there is already market failure for iDEN roaming, and that serious questions remain regarding the availability of roaming in the United States.” Separately, Virgin Mobile said the FCC should focus its attention on “the significant regulatory barriers to entry that threaten the viability of innovative wireless service plans,” instead of technical and economic concerns. It called on the Commission to protect the wireless industry against state and local efforts to “regulate rates, limit wireless products and services to more affluent users and constrain competition.” It also said as the FCC reforms the USF system, it should exempt lower income, lower usage prepaid customers from payment of any USF connections-based fee. Leap Wireless said the CMRS market remained “highly competitive” from the consumer’s standpoint, but it said the Commission should understand the disparity between “the big carriers who possess national market power and the small carriers who do not” and it should “assist the smaller companies in their effort to keep the market competitive.” Dobson Communications and T-Mobile agreed with CTIA earlier comments that the wireless marketplace was “vibrantly competitive.” Dobson urged the FCC to reaffirm its prior finding that “effective CMRS competition exists in rural areas.” T-Mobile said the main concern expressed by rural wireless carriers was about competition from national carriers. “If anything, this demonstrates that the Commission is achieving its goal of increasing competition in rural areas,” it said. T-Mobile said the policy changes proposed by some rural carriers would interfere with competition and its benefits to consumers. It urged the FCC to retain its current licensing rules and avoid intervening in roaming negotiations between rural and national carriers.
Congress is seeking a law that would create a regulatory class for Internet Protocol platforms. It would likely cover services such as VoIP, video over IP and standard broadband, whether delivered by cable providers, phone or power companies. The House will likely seek to keep these services mostly free of regulation, especially by the states. But it will probably try to ensure that VoIP meets public service obligations such as 911 and the Communications Assistance to Law Enforcement Act (CALEA), which would allow police to wiretap Internet phone calls.
Rural telecom groups said Wed. they have “serious concerns” with recommendations for telecom reform by TeleConsensus, a new coalition. TeleConsensus -- which includes SBC, BellSouth, Verizon and NCTA -- was launched Tues. by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce (CD April 13 p6). But the Independent Telephone & Telecom Assn. (ITTA), NTCA, OPASTCO and the Western Telecom Alliance (WTA) said they're concerned about the coalition’s “apparent failure to take into account the distinct needs of community-based providers.” For example, they said, a “consumer voucher system” to distribute USF funds that the coalition backs would be “administratively unworkable and ignores the fact that the single greatest hurdle to high-quality telecommunications service in rural America is high network costs.” They said the voucher system would “inhibit rural carriers’ network deployment ability because there would be no consistent, long-term support for that network infrastructure.” The rural groups complained that the coalition lacks community-based carriers, adding that the firms the group represents emphasize urban areas. “The coalition’s failure to take into account the rural perspective could harm high-tech investment and jobs in those areas and result in policy detrimental to rural consumers and the communities in which they live and work,” the rural groups said.
Senate Commerce Committee Chmn. Stevens (R-Alaska) said Mon. he fears federal funding for school internet services, rural telephone service and library computers could be threatened temporarily. Stevens said a tight calendar could keep Congress from fixing problems the Anti-Deficiency Act creates for the Universal Service Fund, in turn suspending USF payments.
Qwest asked the Neb. PSC to reconsider a March decision requiring facilities-based VoIP providers to pay a state universal service fund contribution on the intrastate portion of their services. Qwest said the PSC order conflicts with federal and state law. It also challenged a PSC finding that Vonage isn’t a facilities- based VoIP provider while Qwest is one. Qwest said the FCC has preempted all state regulation of IP-enabled services like VoIP. Qwest (Case NUSF-40/PI-86) argued that VoIP is an information service, not telecom, and so entirely outside PSC jurisdiction. Qwest said the PSC followed a tortured line of logic in exempting Vonage-type VoIP providers as not facilities-based. The PSC in its order last month had said the FCC hasn’t specifically exempted VoIP from state universal service assessments and surcharges can be levied based on separate prices for the information and telecom components of VoIP service. The PSC said the intrastate portion of VoIP service can be based on actual call data or the FCC’s default safe-harbor allocation.