Security holes in the NFL Mobile app “have been resolved on both iOS and Android,” a spokeswoman for Wandera said Friday. That mobile data gateway alerted the public Tuesday to potential security issues that allegedly made highly valuable personal information at risk of being exposed by hackers, ahead of Sunday's Super Bowl game. Scanning technologies used by Wandera allegedly discovered that after NFL Mobile app users logged into the app, the app “leaks their username and password in a secondary, insecure (unencrypted) API [application program interface] call,” a Wandera news release said. An app user’s username and email address were also leaked in an unencrypted format, allowing a hacker to access an app user’s full NFL profile, which contains personal data. “We’ve looked into this vulnerability and it’s been addressed,” a spokesman for NFL Media said Friday.

The National Hispanic Media Coalition will promote universal and affordable broadband, telecom networks and inclusive media for the Latino community as part of its 2015 policy priorities, NHMC said in an email Tuesday. NHMC will expand public and private broadband adoption programs for Latinos who lack broadband connections and promote telecom policies that treat Latino consumers fairly, it said. The coalition will continue to urge the FCC to reclassify Internet access as a common-carrier service under Communications Act Title II, it said. It will also focus on privacy protections for Latinos in the digital age, it said.

The Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau granted a one-year extension Wednesday of the FCC waiver for advanced communications services (ACS) accessibility rules to a basic class of e-readers, in an order in docket 10-213. E-reader makers had sought a waiver extension for an ongoing period of time, while groups representing the blind and vision impaired had opposed any extension of the initial one-year waiver (see 1411120048). The e-readers in the narrow class are primarily designed for reading text-based digital works, even though they're capable of accessing ACS, the bureau said. It won’t require e-reader manufacturers covered by the waiver to comply with section 14.20, 14.21 or 14.31 of the commission’s rules until Jan. 28, 2016. The bureau urged manufacturers to consider accessible design early on in development stages in future generations of e-readers "to provide ACS as one of their primary functions." "We're disappointed to hear that, but we're glad they haven't granted a permanent waiver," said a spokesman for the National Federation of the Blind. "We don't feel that e-readers should be exempt at all [from ACS rules]. The content of e-readers is 1s and 0s, so it's not inherently visual and can be rendered as pure Braille or other formats." The federation will submit further comments to the FCC, he said. A lawyer for the Coalition of e-Reader Manufacturers that had sought the waiver extension for Amazon, Kobo and Sony declined to comment.

The FCC's decisions in the incentive auction order make it harder for broadcasters who choose not to sell their spectrum, NAB and Sinclair said in their final briefs filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Tuesday. The order's use of TV Study, a 39-month construction deadline and other policies “steamroll” broadcasters in order to secure more spectrum for the auction, the broadcasters said. But NAB's and Sinclair's arguments that the Spectrum Act requires the FCC to use “outdated” OET-69 software are “unreasonable,” the FCC said in its own final brief. The older software can't perform the calculations “necessary to ensure that all stations that will remain on the air following the auction are assigned channels in accordance with the provisions of the Spectrum Act,” quickly enough, the FCC said. The commission's argument that changing the software still fulfills the Spectrum Act's directive not to change the “methodology” doesn't measure up, NAB and Sinclair said. With TVStudy, the commission also is changing the data inputs for terrain elevation and the station specific grids used by the older software, the broadcasters said. “There may be some sense” to the FCC’s argument against using archaic software, NAB said. “But there is sense, too, in Congress’s judgment that the certainty that comes with a familiar standard is critical to achieving a successful, voluntary incentive auction.” In a joint brief CCA, CEA and CTIA also attacked NAB for trying to force the commission to use “archaic software.” The Expanding Opportunities for Broadcaster's coalition also filed a final brief attacking Sinclair's challenges against the construction deadline. “The post-auction transition period reasonably balances the competing public interest objectives of preserving television service and expediting the introduction of new wireless service on reclaimed spectrum,” EOBC said.

The FCC should stop requiring analog tuners in TVs, said Funai representatives in a meeting last week with staff from the Media Bureau and Office of Engineering and Technology, according to an ex parte filing in docket 03-185. “The requirement has largely outlived its purpose because low power TV and TV translators have been moving to digital signals and the remaining stations that have not converted will soon be mandated to broadcast only in digital format,” said Funai. The requirement causes TV manufacturers to design products that “contain substantially more complexity than is required, consume more energy, and are heavier/larger” than digital-only versions would be, the filing said. “The Commission is not legally required to retain this requirement.” Consumers also are "burdened by having to pay the extra cost incurred from complying with this requirement which arises from added hardware, software and various licensing fees," Funai said.

The established multichannel video programming distributor ecosystem is “most certainly going to lose a meaningful number of existing subscribers -- the only question is how many millions and how fast?” said BTIG analyst Richard Greenfield in a research note Monday, after a weeklong review of Sling TV service. “After playing with Sling TV, it is hard not to love the ease-of-use, similar user interface across devices and quality of the experience,” Greenfield said of the $20-per-month plan that offers content from Disney (including ESPN), along with Turner, Scripps and A&E in the future. BTIG “remains confident that free, over-the-air broadcast television networks will not be part of the base Sling TV package,” Greenfield said, saying a “subset of broadcast stations may end up being offered as a premium add-on to Sling.” Among Greenfield’s highlighted callouts: Sling TV's linear channel navigation capability, which offers extra kids’ and news/info packages available as add-ons to the basic service. He said he was able to watch the Australian Open on Sling TV’s iPad version while simultaneously browsing channels. He cited free video-on-demand, which enables users to watch shows that already have started airing or aired earlier in the day. Transactional movies-on-demand allows users to rent movies in SD or HD for a 24-hour viewing period, which includes being able to start a movie on one device and finish on another that’s part of a universal watchlist. Users can pause, rewind and fast forward linear content on some channels, he said. He also said the quality of the video stream fluctuated, at one time delivering at a 3.7 Mbps bitrate and at another time a 4.7 Mbps data stream. On bandwidth consumption, Greenfield said a Sling TV subscriber who watches the industry average of five hours of streamed TV per day at a 4.7 Mbps bitrate would consume 320 GB of data per month. Streaming two hours per day at 3.7 Mbps would eat 100 GB per month, he said. A “significant portion of Sling TV subscribers" will pair their subscription with some combination of Amazon, Hulu and Netflix streaming, he said, resulting in monthly data consumption that will be “quite significant.”

Forty percent of U.S. Internet homes will have a streaming media player by Q1 2017, said an NPD report Monday. Some 16 percent of U.S. Internet homes had a streaming media player in Q1 2014, and that percentage is expected to grow to 24 percent this quarter, NPD said. While early on, Apple and Roku players drove the streaming media player market, Amazon and Google have made a significant impact over the past 18 months, NPD said. Factoring in connected TVs, Blu-ray players and video game consoles, the total projected count for devices delivering apps to TVs will reach 211 million by Q1 2017, it said. On the content provider side, the top five video apps used by streaming media player owners were Netflix, YouTube, Amazon Prime Instant Video, Hulu Plus and HBO Go, said NPD. Amazon had the highest increase of the five, growing from 15 percent viewership to 23 percent from Q4 2013 to Q4 2014, it said. “Over the coming years we will continue to see a growing audience of TV viewers for streaming video services, authenticated network apps, and offerings such as CBS All Access that no longer require a pay TV subscription from a cable or satellite provider,” said John Buffone, executive director, NPD Connected Intelligence. The report was based on a survey conducted in Q4 with more than 5,000 U.S. consumers aged 18 years or older.

The UHD Alliance was formed so “content owners, tech companies and CE companies move together to create a new quality bar that will move all industries forward together,” emailed Stacy Katz, vice president-marketing and technology at Technicolor, one of the alliance’s founding members (see 1501050023). Katz declined to respond directly to remarks by technology consultant Peter Putnam on a Society of Motion Picture and TV Engineers webinar Thursday in which he said that the alliance was formed “to sell more televisions” (see 1501220052). The alliance hasn’t yet appointed an official spokesperson and its marketing committee likely won’t be formed until around March, Katz said Thursday.

The 2015 annual adjustment to the thresholds that trigger automatic FTC and Justice Department review of a merger or acquisition is the smallest in years, said Fletcher Heald wireless attorney Raymond Quianzon on the law firm's blog. The increase from the previous threshold is just half of 1 percent, he said. Under the latest adjustment, federal agencies will review deals where the total value exceeds $305.1 million or where the total value exceeds $76.3 million and one party has total assets of at least $15.3 million and the other party has assets of $152.5 million, he said. This monetary threshold trigger of FTC and Justice review is separate from the FCC review process, which applies to most communications-related deals, Quianzon said. “Once those lines are crossed, the prospect of additional (and considerable) time, expense and hassle to navigate the federal review process is a virtual certainty.” The new thresholds take effect Feb. 20.

If the FCC makes video programmers partly responsible for closed caption quality, it shouldn’t require those programmers to certify to the FCC that their captions meet the standards, said Comcast, DirecTV, NCTA and Charter Communications in separate comments posted online in docket 05-231 Wednesday. The comments were filed in response to an FCC further NPRM requesting comment on proposals to require programmers to submit certification and contact information to the FCC if responsibility for closed caption quality is partly shifted to them, as the FCC considered last year. The lack of a certification requirement in that instance would “confirm that each party is solely and directly responsible for compliance with its own obligations,” said DirecTV. If the responsibility isn’t shifted, the commission should continue to require the certification, Charter said. Requiring programmers to certify that they're in compliance would be a useful way of ensuring that programmers are aware of their responsibility, said a joint filing from Telecommunications for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing and numerous other consumer groups representing the hearing impaired. A certification requirement would “alert VPDs and the Commission that a problem may be afoot when a programmer fails to provide a certification,” said the consumer groups. The American Cable Association and Verizon also both supported a certification rule. “Not requiring video programmers to provide certificates creates enforcement issues and uncertainty for VPDs and for consumers about the specific practices of individual video programmers.” Most of the MVPD commenters and the consumer groups were in favor of requiring programmers to make their contact information available to help with the resolution of captioning problems. NAB disagreed with both certification and contact information requirements. "It is not rational or efficient to encourage consumers to contact a VPP [video programming provider] first,” said NAB. Programmers mostly don’t distribute programming and “are not in a position to readily identify potential captioning issues through the distribution chain,” NAB said. An unintended consequence of a contact information rule would be to turn VPPs into “call centers” for pay-TV providers, which NAB said are more often responsible for captioning problems. “Ultimately, the burden of requiring all VPPs to coordinate and file captioning contact information outweighs any benefit,” NAB said.