AMC Networks hasn't shown it will be irreparably harmed without a standstill order preserving its current program carriage agreement with AT&T pending resolution of AMC's program carriage complaint against the MVPD, the FCC Media Bureau said in an order in Tuesday's Daily Digest denying the programmer's standstill petition (see 2008100048). AMC emailed it's disappointed, but its carriage complaint remains pending "and we look forward to a favorable resolution at the conclusion of the process. As an independent programmer, we are simply asking AT&T to not use their size and scope to competitively disadvantage our business and our programming, and to treat our networks fairly and in the same manner they treat their own services and networks."

Two John Malone-chaired public companies, GCI Liberty and Liberty Broadband, seek FCC OK to combine under Section 214 of the Communications Act, per an application Monday. GCI Liberty would become part of a Liberty Broadband subsidiary, with its operating companies keeping the GCI brand and its Anchorage management and headquarters. The deal was announced in August.

U.S. District Judge George Wu in Los Angeles denied Charter's motion to dismiss the second amended complaint brought by Entertainment Studios (ES) and the National Association of African American Owned Media, in a ruling Friday (in Pacer, docket 16-cv-00609). Charter is accused of racial animus in opting not to carry ES. Charter emailed us Monday it's "disappointed by the ruling and stand[s] by our position that race played no role whatsoever in our programming decision regarding these networks and we will continue to vigorously defend against these false claims.” It said carriage decisions "are based on business considerations, such as cost, quality, uniqueness of content, and customer demand."

Major media and entertainment companies have developed stable delivery models to support their streaming services but see challenges ahead, said a June Comcast Technology Solutions sponsored report released Wednesday. It is part of Comcast’s TV 2025 Initiative, an international research program looking at obstacles and opportunities for streaming. Hurdles include multi-platform native application development, maintaining quality of experience -- especially with premium live experiences such as sports -- and delivering complex streaming services like virtual MVPD offerings reliably at scale, said industry participants. International expansion can also be challenging, it said. By 2025, the streaming market will include light-touch services delivering content mostly via third-party streaming platforms and channel marketplaces in a self-service model on one end and fully featured, high-end streaming services on the other, it said. The best streaming TV services, it said, will benefit from an environment that supports delivery of streaming services -- live and on demand -- at scale to major markets around the world; an integrated approach to advertising that allows linear and nonlinear TV and streaming services to be seamlessly transacted at scale; an artificial intelligence-powered industry that uses machine learning and automation to improve workflows, customer experience, content curation and monetization; and more agile, cloud-based broadcasting operations that support a faster pace of innovation.

Charter Communications and Maine disagree on what the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit's 1995 Time Warner decision means for the cable company's challenge to Maine's cable prorating law (see 2005210004). "Rate structure" in that decision is defined entirely differently than how Charter is defining it in its opposition to Maine's motion to dismiss, and thus no support for its argument, the state said Tuesday in a supplemental brief (in Pacer, docket 20-cv-00168) in support of its motion to dismiss. It told the U.S. District Court in Bangor the prorating law isn't rate regulation because it lets Charter charge whatever it wants to as long as it's providing cable services, and it's when that service is canceled that the state legislature uses "its traditional police powers to protect its citizens from having to pay for cable services they will never receive." Charter in a brief (in Pacer) last week said Time Warner confirms that regulation of rate structure is rate regulation, and thus not allowed under the Cable Act when there's effective competition. It said the Maine law, contrary to state claims, affects pricing of Charter rates by blocking Charter from offering different daily and monthly rates.

Many LFAs are flouting the Cable Act limits on local franchising authorities, and the FCC's 2019 LFA order now under legal challenge (see 1909120028) implements the plain reading of the act, NCTA told the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in an intervenor brief Monday (in Pacer, docket 19-4161) on behalf of the FCC. Even if the Cable Act was ambiguous on LFAs not being able to regulate telecommunications or information services, the LFA order's mixed-use rule is reasonable, the NCTA said.

The cable leased access revised rate structure adopted at the FCC's July meeting (see 2007160045) takes effect Sept. 21, a Media Bureau public notice said Thursday.

The FCC Wireline Bureau is extending until Sept. 2 the comment deadline on Charter Communications' request that the FCC sunset its data cap and usage-based pricing restrictions from its Time Warner Cable/Bright House Networks purchases next year (see 2006180050), it said Tuesday in a public notice. The bureau said it's also seeking comment on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit's decision last week on the Competitive Enterprise Institute's challenge of some TWC/BHN conditions (see 2008140040). Backing Charter's petition, Mediacom, in a docket 16-197 posting Tuesday, said the free market should determine how internet service is offered, rather than regulatory mandates. Not allowing a company to create different tiers of internet service with different caps can mean low users of data end up subsidizing heavy users, it said.

Newsmax relies on its over-the-top streaming video feed to reach Charter Communications subscribers who don't watch its traditional linear video feed, and ending the data cap and interconnection conditions on Charter from the Time Warner Cable/Bright House Networks purchases will hurt the network's chances of reaching them while giving Charter more gatekeeping power. That according to Newsmax CEO Chris Ruddy in a phone call with FCC Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel, said a docket 16-197 ex parte posting Monday. Ruddy also said Charter submitted a new economic declaration containing information that should have been provided as part of the cabler's initial FCC petition to have the conditions dropped, and there should be a comment period on the declaration. And he repeated Newsmax arguments that Charter's petition was put on public notice months too early (see 2007090009).

ACA Connects, saying it might sue, asked the FCC to change staff's lump sum C-band payment determination. The commission’s C-band order requires the payout to include the estimated expense of “necessary changes that will allow the earth stations to receive C-Band services on new frequencies or from new satellites” after relocation, ACA noted. The Wireless Bureau determination "violated that directive by excluding the cost of integrated receivers/decoders" that earth stations "undisputedly" require to continue getting such service, said an application for review of staff's July 30 public notice (see 2007300053). "The Bureau’s lump-sum determination was also arbitrary and capricious and involved prejudicial procedural error," said the AFR posted in docket 18-122 Friday. ACA wants the agency to stay the Aug. 31 lump-sum election deadline. That would "give earth station owners adequate time to demonstrate -- in court, if necessary -- that the" bureau finding was inconsistent with the order, "was developed in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act’s public-notice and disclosure requirements," and had other shortcomings, said an ACA release Friday. Commission spokespeople didn't comment.