Charter Communications began providing International Media Distribution’s TV Japan in standard and high definition for $14.99 monthly on the operator’s cable systems in eight states, said the programmer in a news release Tuesday.

Seventy-six percent of cable, wireless and wireline providers are “planning or actively transitioning” to IPv6, according to a global survey (http://bit.ly/1flSZyX) by Incognito Software released Tuesday. Seventy-two companies replied to the survey, but only 51 were considered “acceptable candidates,” said the report. Thirty-one percent of the respondents were from North America, 14 percent were from South America, 12 percent were from the Asia Pacific, and 43 percent were from Europe, Africa and the Middle East, it said. Thirty-three percent of the operators had more than 1 million subscribers, it said. Eighty-three percent of respondents said they were transitioning to IPv6 because they are “running out of IPv4 resources,” it said. Half of respondents said that customer premises equipment upgrades were a “'large’ hurdle” to IPv6 adoption, it said. Thirty-four percent of respondents in the process of adopting IPv6 expect to complete their transition within the year, it said.

Netflix opposes the Comcast/Time Warner Cable merger because it fears the Internet “faces a long term threat from the largest ISPs driving up profits for themselves and costs for everyone else,” said Netflix CEO Reed Hastings and Chief Financial Officer David Wells in a Q1 letter to shareholders Monday (http://bit.ly/RG48Ww). If the merger is approved, “the combined company’s footprint will pass over 60 percent of U.S. broadband households, after the proposed divestiture, with most of those homes having Comcast as the only option for truly high-speed broadband,” meaning speeds exceeding 10 Mbps, the letter said. “As DSL fades in favor of cable Internet, Comcast could control high-speed broadband to the majority of American homes. Comcast is already dominant enough to be able to capture unprecedented fees from transit providers and services such as Netflix. The combined company would possess even more anticompetitive leverage to charge arbitrary interconnection tolls for access to their customers. For this reason, Netflix opposes this merger."

The FCC should extend the deadline for comments on its rulemaking proposing eliminating the network non-duplication and syndicated exclusivity rules, NAB said in a motion for extension of time filed Thursday (http://bit.ly/1ix8NTR). NAB wants the comment deadline, currently May 12, extended by 45 days to June 26, with the reply comment deadline moved to July 24. NAB “anticipates that it will need to retain expert economists or other analysts” to “conduct necessary research and analysis” to comment on the proceeding, necessitating the extra time, it said.

The proposed Comcast/TWC deal would result in a “media mega-corporation” with “far too much power and control in the marketplace and in the workplace,” said the Writers Guild of America-East (WGAE) in comments filed in docket 14-57 (http://bit.ly/1kF8iba). “It would not be in the public interest and should not be approved,” said the WGAE. Because the company that results from the merger will be “vertically and horizontally integrated” it will “tilt the playing field” against content producers, the filing said. Although Comcast has presented the deal as a way to allow it to compete with challengers such as Apple and Google, the deal would mean that Comcast “would own and control the pipelines into 30 percent of American households,” said the WGAE. The “mega-tech companies” Comcast cites as competitors all rely on Comcast to deliver their products, WGAE said. After the deal, the competing companies will all be “fighting for a share of a vast market which they can only access via the pipeline controlled by one of the combatants, Comcast/NBCU/TWC,” said the filing. The deal will also make it difficult for the Comcast employees WGAE represents, the filing said. NBCUniversal has been able to use its size and power to block ballots in a June 2013 National Labor Relations Board election from being counted, WGAE said. “If this is how Comcast/NBCU treats its own employees now, imagine what it can put its customers through, and imagine how much worse this will be when it expands to gargantuan size through merger and consolidation,” the filing said.

Game Show Network will be allowed to gather evidence to show whether Cablevision would have received a financial benefit from carrying the network on a more widely available tier, ruled FCC Administrative Law Judge Richard Sippel in an order filed Thursday (http://bit.ly/1nemHxF). GSN had argued that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Comcast v. FCC program carriage decision had established a new standard for similar cases, while Cablevision had argued that GSN doesn’t need additional discovery. GSN “must have full opportunity to discover evidence relevant to meeting its burden” of proof, said the order. GSN’s argument that the Comcast decision created a new test for program carriage cases is the same argument Tennis Channel is using in its ongoing push to have the FCC take up its program carriage case against Comcast again (CD March 12 p24). That case is the same one at the heart of Comcast, and Tennis Channel is also asking for permission to gather evidence to meet the D.C. Circuit’s standard. GSN and Tennis Channel are both represented by Covington Burling attorney Stephen Weiswasser.

The FCC should update program access rules so they provide protections to the buying group National Cable Television Cooperative, the American Cable Association told aides to Chairman Tom Wheeler and Commissioner Mike O'Rielly in meetings last week, according to an ex parte filing Tuesday (http://bit.ly/1kz0FDg). Though Congress intended that program access rules apply to buying groups used by multichannel video programming distributors (MVPDs), the rules don’t apply to NCTC, ACA said. NCTC is the buying group “through which nearly all MVPDs that currently use a buying group license most of their national cable programming,” said ACA. “In practice,” the rules don’t apply to NCTC because the FCC definition of a buying group requires such organizations to agree to be liable for members’ deals with content companies, which NCTC doesn’t do, ACA has said. The commission should “update the relevant rules so program access protections account for and extend to the longstanding business model of the NCTC -- a business model that has near universal acceptance among programmers,” ACA said.

DirecTV urged the FCC Office of Engineering and Technology to use OET’s new TVStudy software to update the predictive model used for determining distant signal eligibility for satellite video subscribers, who are located outside a satellite TV company’s designated market area, and are eligible to receive signals from that company. The new software appears likely to improve the individual location Longley Rice (ILLR) model that predicts eligibility for distant network signals, it said in an ex parte filing in docket 10-152 (http://bit.ly/1n90lxw). OET claimed that the new software provides several improvements, including newer population data, better terrain data and more precise geographical coordinates, DirecTV said.

The proposed Comcast/Time Warner Cable merger would harm low-income customers, The Greenlining Institute said Monday in a press release. TWC has taken steps to offer LifeLine to VoIP customers in California and has expressed a willingness to come under California Public Utilities Commission telephone regulations, but Comcast has not, said Energy and Telecommunications Policy Director Stephanie Chen in the release. “This raises a lot of red flags, starting with the possibility that Time Warner Cable customers could have LifeLine service but then lose it if Comcast takes over,” Chen said. “We hear plenty of talk about how this merger will cut costs, but nothing meaningful about how -- or if -- those savings will be passed on to customers,” she said.

Game Show Network adopted the same arguments in its program carriage case against Cablevision as those put forth by Tennis Channel (CD March 12 p24) in its bid to have the FCC reopen its carriage case against Comcast, said a status report filed in GSN’s commission case Thursday (http://bit.ly/1kekhwh). GSN and Tennis Channel are represented by Covington Burling cable attorney Stephen Weiswasser. GSN v. Cablevision had been put on hold to wait for the end of the Tennis Channel case. In both cases, Weiswasser has argued that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit decision against Tennis Channel in Comcast established a new standard of evidence for showing that a company had discriminated against another in program carriage. Though the D.C. Circuit decision never explicitly described a new test for evidence, the court decided against Tennis Channel because it never showed that Comcast didn’t have “a legitimate business purpose to treat unaffiliated program services differently from affiliated services,” said Weiswasser in the status report. That test “had never previously been articulated or applied by the Commission or the Presiding Judge,” said Weiswasser. Cablevision disagreed. The D.C. Circuit didn’t create new tests, but “merely assessed the well-developed trial record before it under the existing Commission standards,” said Cablevision’s status report. “No additional discovery is required and the case is trial ready, as it has been since June 25, 2013 when the matter was stayed to permit the appellate process in Comcast Cable to run its course.” GSN should be allowed to gather only information that updates the existing record to account for the time that has passed, Cablevision said. “GSN now seeks discovery on subjects that the parties have already thoroughly exhausted in document production and depositions.” Both parties have requested a Nov. 12 hearing.