California could be first in the nation to codify the FCC’s definition of digital discrimination into state law. Assemblymember Mia Bonta (D) introduced AB-2239 on Wednesday, the California Alliance for Digital Equity said Thursday. “This bill would state the intent of the Legislature to adopt subsequent legislation that codifies a definition of ‘digital discrimination of access’ in state law that conforms to the definition adopted by the Federal Communications Commission,” said a legislative digest on the measure. In a November order (see 2311150040), the FCC defined “digital discrimination of access” as “policies or practices, not justified by genuine issues of technical or economic feasibility, that (1) differentially impact consumers' access to broadband internet access service based on their income level, race, ethnicity, color, religion, or national origin or (2) are intended to have such differential impact.” Defining digital discrimination could help move a proceeding on digital redlining at the California Public Utilities Commission, said Shayna Englin, California Community Foundation director-digital equity initiative, in an interview. The proceeding stalled amid argument about the definition, said Englin. CPUC digital redlining rules would guide the agency in the years ahead as it distributes $8 billion state and federal broadband funding, she said. Englin predicted a fight between digital equity advocates and the telecom industry, which is expected to oppose AB-2239. The California Broadband and Video Association is reviewing the legislation, said a spokesperson for the state cable group. USTelecom declined to comment. The Los Angeles City Council passed a similar law at the local level last month.

The Florida House Commerce Committee unanimously supported a bill Thursday to extend dollar broadband attachments through 2028. The Ways and Means Committee previously cleared HB-1147, which would extend a promotional rate that the state began offering in 2021 (see 2401310072). It lets ISPs pay $1 a year per wireline attachment per pole to bring broadband to unserved or underserved areas in municipal electric utility service territories. The promo will expire July 1 unless extended. The bill could next get a House floor vote. The Senate could soon vote on a similar bill (SB-1218) that cleared the Rules Committee by a 19-0 vote Thursday.

A Virginia Senate panel cleared kids’ privacy and social media bills Wednesday. The General Laws and Technology Committee voted 14-0 for SB-359, prohibiting social media operators from providing an “addictive feed” to users younger than 18 without verifiable parental consent. The bill defines an addictive feed as “a website, online service, or online or mobile application, or a portion thereof, in which multiple pieces of media generated or shared by users of a website, online service, or online or mobile application, either concurrently or sequentially, are recommended, selected, or prioritized for display to a user based, in whole or in part, on information associated with the user or the user's device.” The committee voted 15-0 for SB-361, which would add children-specific protections to the state’s comprehensive consumer privacy law. It would prohibit data controllers from selling a child’s data or using it for targeted advertising or profiling. The House approved the similar HB-707 on Tuesday (see 2402070063).

Utah state senators supported requiring content filters to be activated for minors using tablets and smartphones. The Senate voted 25-3 to approve SB-104 and send it to the House on Wednesday.

A Hawaii digital equity bill cleared the Senate Energy Committee by a 5-0 vote Tuesday. The panel approved SB-3048 to seek out remaining obstacles to digital equity and establish a grant program. The bill next needs the Judiciary and Ways and Means committees’ approval. A House version cleared that chamber’s Technology Committee last week (see 2402050024).

The Virginia Senate passed a junk-fees bill Tuesday that the wireless industry raised concerns about last month. Also on that day the Senate approved an AI bill and the House passed a kids privacy bill. State senators voted 28-11 for SB-388, which would prohibit businesses from displaying prices that don’t include mandatory added fees other than taxes. CTIA opposed including the wireless industry in the bill. The FCC’s 2023 broadband labeling rules already protect consumers from surprise or unfair fees, the association said in a Jan. 24 letter. Wireless providers also follow the FCC’s truth-in-billing requirements, CTIA said. “Any new law should expressly exempt services already regulated by the FCC.” The Virginia Senate voted 39-0 for SB-487, which would set guardrails on public bodies’ use of AI. The House voted 98-0 for HB-707, which would add children-specific protections to the state’s comprehensive consumer privacy law. It would prohibit data controllers from selling a child’s personal data or using it for targeted advertising or profiling (see 2401310071).

The Florida Senate's version of a bill banning kids younger than 16 from having social media accounts cleared the Judiciary Committee on Monday. The panel voted 7-2 for Sen. Erin Grall's (R) SB-1788. It shares language with the House-approved HB-1, including prohibiting children from having accounts even with parental consent. However, the Senate bill wouldn't require social websites to disclose social media's possible mental health issues to those 16-18. A bipartisan majority in the House supported HB-1 last month (see 2401240079). Also, the Judiciary Committee voted 9-0 for Grall's SB-1792, which would require strict age verification for porn websites. It’s similar to HB-3, which unanimously passed the House (see 2401250017).

Cable customers moving to long-term care facilities could avoid paying early-termination fees when ending contracts under a New Jersey bill the state's Senate Commerce Committee advanced Monday. The panel voted 5-0 for S-684, which would require a physician’s referral. Last year’s version of the bill stalled after the same committee approved it. The New Jersey Division of Rate Counsel supported S-684 in a letter to the committee Friday. “This requirement will ensure that consumers and their loved ones have one less financial and practical concern when making the often-difficult choice to relocate to a long-term care facility,” Division Director Brian Lipman wrote.

The Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission could decide by July 8 on Lumen’s Jan. 8 petition seeking competitive classification for all its CenturyLink ILECs around the state. Under a procedural schedule ordered Monday (docket UT-240029), the Washington UTC will receive Lumen direct testimony Feb. 16, staff and public counsel response testimony April 3 and the company’s rebuttal May 10. The commission will hold a virtual public comment hearing May 16, an evidentiary hearing May 24 and a second virtual public comment hearing June 6. Then post-hearing briefs will be due June 12. CenturyLink has operated for nearly a decade under an alternative form of regulation in Washington state, the commission noted in a Jan. 25 order setting the matter for adjudication: “We must explore whether the Company retains a significant captive customer base or is truly subject to effective competition.”

Congress should extend the affordable connectivity program, Wisconsin Public Service Commission Chairperson Summer Strand wrote Tuesday. “The ACP is an effective resource for millions of families,” said Strand. “Access to broadband infrastructure alone is not enough to bridge the digital divide … The path to internet affordability starts by extending the ACP.”