The House Judiciary IP Subcommittee plans a hearing on copyright protection and management systems Wednesday at 10 a.m. in 2141 Rayburn, said a committee news release Friday (http://1.usa.gov/1uzxrYP). The subcommittee plans a Thursday hearing on oversight of the Copyright Office at 2 p.m. in the same room, it said (http://1.usa.gov/1AHlscs). Register of Copyrights Maria Pallante is to be a witness Thursday, it said. No other witnesses were announced.
Among the dozen items the Senate Commerce Committee will consider at its Wednesday executive session are the Satellite Television Access and Viewer Rights Act (S-2799), as long expected (CD Aug 22 p10), and the E-Label Act (S-2583), said an agenda that Commerce released Friday. The House unanimously passed the E-Label Act last week, much to industry satisfaction. “By granting device manufacturers the ability to use eLabels, the legislation eases the technical and logistical burdens on manufacturers and improves consumer access to important device information,” said Telecommunications Industry Association President Grant Seiffert in a statement after the House passage. Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., is one of the backers of the Senate version of the E-label bill. The session is scheduled for 2:30 p.m. in 253 Russell.
A new draft of the Satellite Television Access and Viewer Rights Act (S-2799) began circulating among Senate Commerce Committee offices Friday, far shorter than the first version Senate Commerce Committee heads offered up a week before. This version is 14 pages compared to the initial 39. It no longer includes the Local Choice proposal and modifies other provisions included in the draft. The first draft directed the FCC to update good-faith retransmission consent negotiating rules in a rulemaking, looking at blocking of online content. The substitute calls for such an FCC reexamination but makes no mention of online blocking. It still includes provisions on joint retrans negotiation.
Sen. Dean Heller, R-Nev., expressed some concerns to FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler about companies using exemptions from the agency’s ex parte rules in its consideration of the proposed Comcast/Time Warner Cable and AT&T/DirecTV deals. Exemptions may be given if parties fear reprisal, as Heller noted. “The bar for such exemptions must be high,” Heller told Wheeler in a letter Wednesday. “When orders that have significant impact on the industry are crafted based on information provided in secret and go unchallenged, I believe it can undermine the effectiveness of that order.” He asked Wheeler to say whether such exempt ex parte presentations have been given and if so, how many. “Please provide the specific justification for each instance,” Heller said. He also asked about “the role the FCC played in this action” and whether it “directly influenced granting an exemption” and if so, why. The FCC declined comment.
The bipartisan group of sponsors from both houses of Congress of the Wi-Fi Innovation Act wrote the FCC a joint letter Wednesday to “express our strong support for freeing up underutilized spectrum to maximize unlicensed use in the upper 5 GHz band,” as the legislation asks. The letter was signed by Sens. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., and Cory Booker, D-N.J., and Reps. Bob Latta, R-Ohio; Anna Eshoo, D-Calif.; Darrell Issa, R-Calif.; and Doris Matsui, D-Calif. The upper 5 GHz band has “a unique opportunity” in maximizing those Wi-Fi frequencies, they said, saying they're “confident that the FCC can successfully resolve any potential interference issues through analysis and testing,” as they recommended.
The FCC will put rural phone companies in an “untenable position" with its current rate floor, a bipartisan group of senators told the FCC in a letter. Senate Communications Subcommittee Chairman Mark Pryor, D-Ark., and Sen. John Boozman, R-Ark., led the letter, backed by seven other Democratic senators and seven Republicans. Rural companies “must choose between raising rates to levels that, in some cases, are more than the rates their urban counterparts charge many of their customers, or receiving reduced universal service support,” the senators said (http://1.usa.gov/1tCIuyN). “This is in spite of the fact that these rural exchanges often do not resemble their urban areas along key metrics like population, geography, and income, as well as other demographics.” The FCC should “reevaluate the structure of the rate floor and consider changes to ensure that rural consumers are protected from unnecessarily excessive rate hikes,” they said. The FCC declined comment.
The House Communications Subcommittee gave more details about the hearing it plans to hold Wednesday on FCC management and spending. It will take place at 10:15 a.m. in 2123 Rayburn. As previously announced, witnesses are FCC Managing Director Jon Wilkins and FCC Inspector General David Hunt.
The Senate Commerce Committee said it plans an executive session meeting Wednesday at 2:30 p.m. in 253 Russell. Commerce has not yet listed any agenda. Lobbyists and Capitol Hill staffers have widely expected since late last month that Commerce’s Satellite Television Extension and Localism Act reauthorization bill will be marked up that day (CD Sept 11 p6).
The House unanimously approved the E-Label Act (HR-5161) Thursday under suspension of the rules. “Not only will this give manufacturers greater flexibility to design innovative products that consumers demand, but by some estimates e-labeling will save manufacturers over $80 million per year,” said House Communications Subcommittee Vice Chairman Bob Latta, R-Ohio, in a statement. “E-labeling can expand consumer access to relevant device information, and enhance the overall quality and availability of equipment identification records through supporting software.” House Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton, R-Mich., touted House passage of the E-Label Act and earlier this week, the Anti-Spoofing Act (HR-3670), as part of the committee’s record of success. The House “voted to protect consumers and relieve the regulatory burden on electronics manufacturers,” Upton said in a statement.
Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., is interested in the concept of net neutrality rules based on Communications Act Title II jurisdiction but with such Title II regulation limited to net neutrality, a House Democratic aide told us Thursday. Some net neutrality advocates called for Title II reclassification of broadband, including several congressional Democrats, while Republicans and industry groups oppose reclassification (CD Sept 10 p5). Lofgren is considering sending a letter to the FCC, eyeing next week, but is still examining options and in a preliminary stage, the aide said.