The Commerce Department on Jan. 31 finalized an interim rule on the dispute settlement mechanism for reviewing antidumping and countervailing duty decisions from the U.S., Canada and Mexico. The rule references the provision under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement as opposed to the relevant article under the North American Free Trade Agreement -- the predecessor to the USMCA.

The Commerce Department and the International Trade Commission published the following Federal Register notices Jan. 30-31 on AD/CVD proceedings:

The Commerce Department and the International Trade Commission published the following Federal Register notices Jan. 29 on AD/CVD proceedings:

The Commerce Department and the International Trade Commission published the following Federal Register notices Jan. 26 on AD/CVD proceedings:

The antidumping and countervailing duty orders on wooden cabinets and vanities from China covers cabinets and vanities made from phragmites, a type of reed, the Commerce Department said in a Jan. 12 scope ruling that found merchandise exported by Nanjing Kayling subject to AD/CVD.

A model of spare light truck tires imported from Thailand by Cheng Shin Rubber USA is not covered by an antidumping duty order on Thai light truck tires, Commerce said in a Jan. 18 scope ruling. The products were for temporary use only, and temporary tires are excluded from the order, it said.

End module side cover and cable tray connection brackets from India imported by Sigma aren't covered by antidumping and countervailing duties on Indian cold-rolled steel flat products, Commerce said in a Dec. 13 scope ruling. It said the products were excluded from the order because they had undergone enough further processing.

The Commerce Department and the International Trade Commission published the following Federal Register notices Jan. 25 on AD/CVD proceedings:

Seven metal bed frame models with wood panels and slats that were imported by Zinus are not subject to antidumping duties on wooden bedroom furniture from China, the Commerce Department said in a Jan. 11 scope ruling. The AD order does not cover the furniture because it is not “made substantially of wood.”

The Commerce Department and the International Trade Commission published the following Federal Register notices Jan. 24 on AD/CVD proceedings: