Consultant: Fixed Wireless Not Necessarily the BEAD Winner
NTIA now taking a "lowest cost wins" approach in BEAD doesn't necessarily doom fiber applicants, consultant and former FCC Wireline Bureau Deputy Chief Carol Mattey wrote Monday. The June 6 policy notice, which directed states to hold another round of…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Export Compliance Daily combines U.S. export control news, foreign border import regulation and policy developments into a single daily information service that reliably informs its trade professional readers about important current issues affecting their operations.
bidding to select the lowest-cost option, doesn't mean fixed wireless applicants will prevail over fiber ones around the U.S., she said. Priority projects still win over non-priority ones, with states determining which projects qualify, Mattey said. There won't be cost comparisons between priority and non-priority projects seeking funding for the same geographic area, she said. The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act defined a priority broadband project as one that can meet 100/20 Mbps speeds, easily scale over time and meet the connectivity needs of homes, businesses, 5G and other wireless technologies, she noted. While NTIA has decided that it was wrong to presume that only fiber qualified as a priority broadband project, "it would be equally inappropriate for a state broadband office to make a blanket decision that all fixed wireless applications qualify" as priority, Mattey said.