FCC: Loper Bright Shouldn't Affect $518,000 Gray Appeal
The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision eliminating Chevron deference shouldn’t affect the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' approach to Gray Television’s appeal of an FCC $518,000 forfeiture order, the agency said in a supplemental brief Wednesday. The 11th Circuit requested…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Export Compliance Daily combines U.S. export control news, foreign border import regulation and policy developments into a single daily information service that reliably informs its trade professional readers about important current issues affecting their operations.
supplemental briefs from the FCC and Gray after SCOTUS’ Loper Bright v. Raimondo decision (see 2407110058). The agency applied the best reading of its rule against affiliate swaps and so doesn’t require special deference for the court to rule in its favor, the FCC said. Gray’s argument that its purchase of a station affiliation in Anchorage didn't “result” in a top-four duopoly because Gray already owned such a duopoly “is not the best or most natural reading” of the text of the FCC’s rules, the agency said. The court should also favor the FCC’s interpretation of its own rules under another SCOTUS precedent that wasn’t affected by Loper Bright, Kisor v. Wilkie, the FCC said. Kisor requires that the court consider a regulation as if there were no agency interpretation, but if ambiguity remains, it allows the court to conclude that the agency interpretation may be appropriate. Gray has argued that the Loper Bright decision invalidated Kisor precedent. “This Court is not the proper forum to revisit binding Supreme Court precedent,” the FCC said. The 11th Circuit shouldn’t consider Gray’s arguments that the FCC doesn’t have statutory authority over the sale of a station’s affiliation because Gray didn’t raise the argument earlier in the case and because it's outside the scope of the supplemental brief the court requested, the agency said. Gray “improperly expanded the scope of the supplemental briefing, and the court may not reach arguments on which the FCC had no ‘opportunity to pass’ in the administrative proceedings,” the FCC said.