FTC Staffer Calls for More Scrutiny of Big-Tech Buys
Big-tech acquisitions of startup competitors are harmful because startups usually deliver the “paradigm shifting innovations,” FTC staffer Lina Khan said at Wednesday’s competition policy hearing (see 1810160062). Antitrust enforcers should be wary of seemingly harmless acquisitions like Facebook’s 2013 buy…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Export Compliance Daily combines U.S. export control news, foreign border import regulation and policy developments into a single daily information service that reliably informs its trade professional readers about important current issues affecting their operations.
of VPN provider Onavo, argued Khan, a staffer for Commissioner Rohit Chopra and fellow at Columbia University Law School. Onavo grants users heightened security, but it allows the social network to track in “extremely close detail” which rival apps are diverting attention from Facebook, she said. This allows the platform to detect which startups are the biggest competitive threat, shaping acquisition strategy and leading to purchases of apps like tbh and Moves, Khan said. These types of acquisition might not directly affect competition in the digital market, but they improve Facebook’s position and strengthen its leverage as incumbent, she said. It’s unclear how much competition is the right amount to produce a healthy amount of innovation, argued University of California-Berkeley economist Steven Tadelis. Companies need market power to reap the benefits of innovation, he said. Tadelis is convinced current antitrust tools guided by solid economic thinking are adequate, and each case should be evaluated on its own merits. Former FTC General Counsel Willard Tom, now at Morgan Lewis, agreed existing antitrust tools are adequate. Early stage entry is now extremely cheap and easy, given cost reductions with cloud computing, Tadelis said.